There is strong empirical evidence that the pricing kernel is U-shaped, which provides a way to explain the substantial coskewness premium. Existing studies typically use a polynomial approximation of the pricing kernel. Problematically, these polynomials have, in most cases, increasing parts by construction. Therefore, it is not clear whether the increasing parts are an artifact of the chosen functional form. Taking this concept into consideration, this paper shows that pricing kernels, as estimated by the generalized method of moments on equity data, are still U-shaped and that the increasing part is not a statistical artifact. This conclusion derives from the fact that the functional form of kernels, which allows for strictly decreasing kernels as well as for kernels with increasing parts, is still U-shaped. These results arise from checking for higher order polynomials, various time horizons, and different functional forms of the kernel.
Our goal is to provide a simple, intuitive and model-free motivation for the importance of volatility-of-volatility in pricing certain kinds of exotic and structured products.
We analyze complex bond portfolios within the framework of a dynamic general equilibrium asset-pricing model. Equilibrium bond portfolios are nonsensical and imply a trading volume that vastly exceeds observed trading volume on financial markets. Instead, portfolios that combine bond ladders with a market portfolio of equity assets are nearly optimal investment strategies. The welfare loss of these simple investment strategies, when compared to the equilibrium portfolio, converges to zero as the length of the bond ladder increases. This article, therefore, provides a rationale for naming bond ladders as a popular bond investment strategy.
We develop a dynamic model of a firm facing agency costs of free cash flow and externalfinancing costs, and derive an explicit solution for the firm’s optimal balance sheet dynamics. Financial frictions affect issuance and dividend policies, the value of cash holdings, and the dynamics of stock prices. The model predicts that the marginal value of cash varies negatively with the stock price, and positively with the volatility of the stock price. This yields novel insights on the asymmetric volatility phenomenon, on risk management policies, and on how business cycles and agency costs affect the volatility of stock returns.
We analyze the demand for hedging and insurance by a firm facingcash-flow risks. We study how the firm’s liquidity managementpolicy interacts with two types of risk: a Brownian risk that canbe hedged through a financial derivative, and a Poisson risk thatcan be insured by an insurance contract. We find that the patternsof insurance and hedging decisions are pole apart: cash-poor firmsshould hedge but not insure, whereas the opposite is true for cashrichfirms. We also find non-monotonic effects of profitability. Thismay explain the mixed findings of empirical studies on corporatedemand for hedging and insurance.
Antitrust authorities often argue that merchants cannot reasonably turn down payment cards and therefore must accept excessively high merchant discounts. The paper attempts to shed light on this must-take cards view from two angles. First, the paper gives some operational content to the notion of must-take card through the avoided-cost test or tourist test: would the merchant want to refuse a card payment when a non-repeat customer with enough cash in her pocket is about to pay at the cash register? It analyzes its relevance as an indicator of excessive interchange fees. Second, it identifies four key sources of potential social biases in the payment card systems' determination of interchange fees and compares the industry and social optima both in the short term (fixed number of issuers) and the long term (in which issuer offerings and entry respond to profitability).
