Purpose To develop and test a novel method for coil placement in interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)/functional MRI (fMRI) studies.Materials and Methods Initially, a desired TMS coil position at the subject's head is recorded using a neuronavigation system. Subsequently, a custom-made holding device is used for coil placement inside the MR scanner. The parameters of the device corresponding to the prerecorded position are automatically determined from a fast structural image acquired directly before the experiment. The spatial accuracy of our method was verified on a phantom. Finally, in a study on five subjects, the coil was placed above the cortical representation of a hand muscle in M1 and the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses to short repetitive TMS (rTMS) trains were assessed using echo-planar imaging (EPI) recordings.Results The spatial accuracy of our method is in the range of 2.9 ± 1.3 (SD) mm. Motor cortex stimulation resulted in robust BOLD activations in motor- and auditoryrelated brain areas, with the activation in M1 being localized in the hand knob.Conclusion We present a user-friendly method for TMS coil positioning in the MR scanner that exhibits good spatial accuracy and speeds up the setup of the experiment. The motor-cortex study proves the viability of the approach and validates our interleaved TMS/fMRI setup.
Authority and power permeate political, social, and economic life, but empirical knowledge about the motivational origins and consequences of authority is limited. We study the motivation and incentive effects of authority experimentally in an authority delegation game. Individuals often retain authority even when its delegation is in their material interest—suggesting that authority has nonpecuniary consequences for utility. Authority also leads to over provision of effort by the controlling parties, while a large percentage of subordinates underprovide effort despite pecuniary incentives to the contrary. Authority thus has important motivational consequences that exacerbate the inefficiencies arising from suboptimal delegation choices. {JEL C92, D23, D82)
Das Geschehen auf den Finanzmärkten hängt vom individuellen Verhalten ab, wird aber auch wesentlich bestimmt durch die Ausgestaltung des Finanzsystems, das heisst durch die Rollen, die den einzelnen Akteure zugewiesen werden, und durch die Regeln für die Interaktion der verschiedenen Rollen. Diese Arbeit behandelt nach einleitenden methodischen Vorbemerkungen zunächst die Frage der Verantwortung im gesamtwirtschaftlichen System (Kapitel 2) und beschäftigt sich dann mit der Verantwortung von einflussreichen Rollen und Subsystemen der Wirtschaft. Insbesondere wird diskutiert, was Verantwortung für die Ökonomie und die Finance als wissenschaftliches Disziplin bedeutet (Kapitel 3). Kapitel 4 setzt sich mit dem Finanzsystem auseinander und argumentiert, dass eine Inflation an Finanzprodukten und Finanztransaktionen zu Konfusion und negativen externen Effekten führt, die das Marktgeschehen in der realen Wirtschaft und im Finanzsektor stören. Im abschliessenden fünften Kapitel werden politische Massnahmen zur Herstellung von Ordnung im Finanzsystem dargelegt.
High-performance work systems give workers more discretion, thereby increasing effortproductivity but also shirking opportunities. We show experimentally that screening for workattitude and labor market competition are causal determinants of the viability of high-performancework systems, and we identify the complementarities between discretion, rent-sharing, andscreening that render them profitable. Two fundamentally distinct job designs emergeendogenously in our experiments: "bad" jobs with low discretion, low wages, and little rentsharing,and "good" jobs with high discretion, high wages, and substantial rent-sharing. Good jobsare profitable only if employees can be screened, and labor market competition fosters theirdissemination.
This paper exploits variation in the timing and outcomes of
employment discrimination lawsuits against U.S. law enforcement agencies
to estimate the cumulative and persistent employment effects of
temporary externally imposed affirmative action (AA). We find that AA
increased black employment at all ranks by 4.5 to 6.2 percentage points
relative to national trends. We also find no erosion of these employment
gains in the fifteen years following AA termination, although black
employment growth was significantly lower in departments after AA ended
than in departments whose plans continued. For women, in contrast, we
find only marginal employment gains at lower ranks.
This paper provides evidence that scores on simple, low-stakes tests are associated with future economic success because the scores also reflect test takers' personality traits associated with their level of intrinsic motivation. To establish this, I use the coding speed test that was administered without incentives to participants in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY). I show that, controlling for cognitive ability, the coding speed scores are correlated with future earnings of male NLSY participants. I provide evidence that the coding speed scores relate to intrinsic motivation. I show that the scores of the highly motivated, though less educated, group (potential recruits to the U.S. military), are higher than the NLSY participants' scores. I use controlled experiments to show directly that intrinsic motivation is an important component of the unincentivized coding speed scores and that it relates to test takers' personality traits.
We often have to make risky decisions between alternatives with outcomes that can be better or worse than the outcomes of safer alternatives. Although previous studies have implicated various brain regions in risky decision making, it remains unknown which regions are crucial for balancing whether to take a risk or play it safe. Here, we focused on the anterior insular cortex (AIC), the causal involvement of which in risky decision making is still unclear, although human imaging studies have reported AIC activation in various gambling tasks. We investigated the effects of temporarily inactivating the AIC on rats' risk preference in two types of gambling tasks, one in which risk arose in reward amount and one in which it arose in reward delay. As a control within the same subjects, we inactivated the adjacent orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), which is well known to affect risk preference. In both gambling tasks, AIC inactivation decreased risk preference whereas OFC inactivation increased it. In risk-free control situations, AIC and OFC inactivations did not affect decision making. These results suggest that the AIC is causally involved in risky decision making and promotes risk taking. The AIC and OFC may be crucial for the opposing motives of whether to take a risk or avoid it.
Emotions seem to play a critical role in moral judgment. However, the way in which emotions exert their influence on moral judgments is still poorly understood. This study proposes a novel theoretical approach suggesting that emotions influence moral judgments based on their motivational dimension. We tested the effects of two types of induced emotions with equal valence but with different motivational implications (anger and disgust), and four types of moral scenarios (disgust-related, impersonal, personal, and beliefs) on moral judgments. We hypothesized and found that approach motivation associated with anger would make moral judgments more permissible, while disgust, associated with withdrawal motivation, would make them less permissible. Moreover, these effects varied as a function of the type of scenario: the induced emotions only affected moral judgments concerning impersonal and personal scenarios, while we observed no effects for the other scenarios. These findings suggest that emotions can play an important role in moral judgment, but that their specific effects depend upon the type of emotion induced. Furthermore, induced emotion effects were more prevalent for moral decisions in personal and impersonal scenarios, possibly because these require the performance of an action rather than making an abstract judgment. We conclude that the effects of induced emotions on moral judgments can be predicted by taking their motivational dimension into account. This finding has important implications for moral psychology, as it points toward a previously overlooked mechanism linking emotions to moral judgments.