Université de Genève

Public discourses about Muslims and Islam in Europe

The Global Justice Movement: How Far Does the Classic Social Movement Agenda Go in Explaining Transnational Contention?

Description: 

Titre du projet: Mouvements de la société civile mondiale: Dynamique des campagnes internationales et de la mise en œuvre nationale

National Constraints and Scale Shift in Current Transnational Activism

Description: 

Since Charles Tilly’s path-breaking work on the emergence of the modern pro- test politics during the historical transformation from an old to a new repertoire of contention (Tilly 1984, 1986 and 1995), social movements have been conceptualised as being inherently national or sub-national phenomena. Now, things seem to have changed. Over the past few years, transnational contention has increased considerably and a new collective actor has emerged. This new collective actor – which is defined variously as the no-global movement, anti-globalisation movement, alter-globalisation movement, global justice movement (GJM), movement for a globalisation from below, among other labels – includes a wide range of groups, mobilises various social networks and addresses many different, albeit interrelated issues relating to the struggle against neoliberalism (Sommier 2003). The most salient issues bear on social and economic injustice, North-South inequalities, international trade rules and barriers, fair trade, global environmental problems, sustainable development and so forth.1 We use the label ‘global justice movement’ as we think that what unites the various organisations and groups mobilising on these issues is their willingness to bring about a new world order based on justice.

Mouvements sociaux et Etat : Mobilisations sociales et transformations de la société en Europe

The Global Justice Movement in Switzerland

Introduction: Four Dialogues on Migration Policy

Welfare States, Labour Markets, and the Political Opportunities for Collective Action in the field of Unemployment: A Theoretical Framework

Description: 

As sociological neo-institutionalist theories have shown, social and political institutions are not only a set of rules, procedures, organizational routines and governance structures (see March and Olsen 1984), but they also provide norms and habits that determine individual choices and behaviours. in this chapter, we would like to apply this line of reasoning to propose a theoretical framework for the study of collective action in the field of unemployment politics. We propose a framework for analysis based on the idea that the form and content of political claim-making on issues relating to unemployment are influenced in important ways by the prevailing conceptions of the welfare state and the consequent institutional approaches to unemployment.

Quiescent or Invisible?: Precarious and Unemployed Movements in Europe

Biographical Impact

State and Civil Society Responses to Unemployment: Welfare, Conditionality and Collective Action

Pages

Le portail de l'information économique suisse

© 2016 Infonet Economy

Subscribe to RSS - Université de Genève